Demonizing Israel has long been Norman Finkelstein's obsession. It has brought him fame, perhaps fortune, and a lifetime of celebrity status amongst those equally obsessed with demonizing Jews and Israel.
He does not deny the mass murdering, mutilations and other atrocities Hamas, Islamic Jihad and others from Gaza committed on October 7, 2023, inside of Israel against babies, children, women, defenseless people of all ages. Instead, he defends and justifies the murder, mutilations and other atrocities; terrible evils and cruelties that are always indefensible and never justifiable.
Regarding the sexual abuse and rape that Hamas, Islamic Jihad and others from Gaza committed on October 7, he shifts from justifying and defending murder, mutilating and other atrocities, to trying to disprove that rape and sexual abuse were committed on that day.
It takes an enormous leap of faith to believe that people that can stomach murdering, mutilating, beheading, cutting people open, dismembering, burning people, and more, somehow find raping and sexually abusing immoral or crimes that are off limits.
Finklestein asserts that the absence of video or digital records of the sexual abuse and raping is proof that these crimes did not occur.
It is not suprising that people raised in a culture that glorifies murdering Jews would gladly broadcast and film the slaughter. Murdering Jews is a source of pride to Hamas and company. Filming it is a way of bragging, terrorizing, and showing off. There is a recorded phone conversation, for example, of a Palestinian Arab bragging to his parents that he murdered 10 Jewish civilians. The father and mother, instead of being horrified, express joy and deep approval. Hamas and company videotaped many of their murders and graphic atrocities on that day.
It is not surprising that people in that same culture, steeped in modesty, having women and girls covered, would not want to film themselves, or be caught on camera naked or showing their genitals or in compromising positions raping and sexually abusing men, boys, girls and women.
ISIS also mass murdered and raped. They often took videos of beheadings and other murders that they posted on social media, but not of their sexual abuse.
What did Finklestein need to see in order to believe? Graphic, gruesome pornographic videos of the raping and sexual abuse? The absence of videos and a digital record do not in any way mean the crimes did not occur. And if they do exist, there is no way it would be released to the public. Which includes Finklestein.
The mass rapes and sexual abuse Hamas and others from Gaza committed on October 7 was not a controlled crime scene. Many bodies were boobytrapped, including with grenades. Terrorists were still in the area. It was a mass casualty event in a time of war and terror. Not a controlled police crime scene where investigators take their time and document everything.
Many of the victims of the rapes and sexual abuse were murdered. Silencing by murder silences voices but does not mean that Hamas and company did not violate their bodies before, during or after being murdered.
Plenty of people saw what Finkelstein never did see and probably could never stomach. There were first responders, forensic pathologists, morgue employees, doctors, nursses, other medical personal, and others.
There were survivors and witnesses that Finkelstein attempts to discredit.
He questions how they were interrogated, showing no understanding of how victims or witnesses of rape and sexual abuse crimes are interviewed, not interrogated.
Finklestein writes, "How is it possible to ferret out “credible information” if an alleged witness is preemptively insulated from aggressive, skeptical interrogation?"
Two retired cops with extensive investigative experience respond to Finklestein's assertion. It is clear that he has no knowledge or experience conducting a criminal investigation, especially when it comes to rape and sexual abuse. Also, this was a mass casualty massacre, sexual abuse and other atrocities event by well-armed terrorists. Does he actually think it is appropriate to conduct skeptical, aggressive interrogations of witnesses or victims? Witnesses and victims are exactly that, witnesses and victims. They are not offenders in which a different standard of questioning is applied, which can include aggressive, skeptical interrogations.
Captured Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists are on record confessing to rape, sexual abuse, mutilation and more. In that Finklestein routinely likes to project onto Israelis the genocidal desires that Hamas openly declares and acts upon, such as what they did on October 7, 2023, it is doubtful that people obsessed with demonizing Israelis will give credence to the confessions of Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists.
Finklestein seems to believe that at least some people hiding during the attack should have been able to record the sexual assaults. Witnesses hiding could not realistically be expected to risk being spotted by attempting to capture on their phones the horrors unfolding before them. The absence of graphic videos of rape and sexual abuse by witnesses does not in any way disprove that the crimes did not occur.
He continuously asserts that the absence of a digital record, actual videos and photos of the raping and sexual abuse proves that these crimes did not occur.
By the Finklestein standard, we are henceforth to believe that when rape and sexual abuse occurs, if the perpetrators do not film or videotape their actions, then they are innocent and no crime occurred. And if there are any witnesses, then they are perversely responsible for making videos and digital records.
As already mentioned, it does not seem to dawn on Finklestein that there are reasons why rapists and sexual abusers choose not to document their crimes. Hamas was proud of its murdering. This does not mean Hamas was equally proud or willing to share its sexual abusing and raping.
And again, even if there is a digital record of the sexual abuse and rapes, there is no way this would be shared as public information. And that includes with Finklestein.
Finklestein names one of the chapters of his recent book, "Rape Fantasies". He uses the words, "rape hoax" to describe the rape and sexual abuse.
Finklestein seems far more interested in humiliating, ridiculing, demeaning, insulting and abusing the victims, survivors, forensic experts, first responders and eyewitnesses of the mass murder, mutilations, rapes, sexual abuse and other atrocities committed by Hamas and company on October 7 than of actually disproving that sexual abuse and rape occurred on that day. This effort seems like little more than an exercise in depravity.
Here are some examples:
A response by Finklestein to a first responder's testimony- first the responders quote, ‘I couldn’t close her legs in order to place her into the [body] bag. . .. They had inserted various cans into her. Her legs were spread open. I looked more closely: she was half-naked, and they had inserted tin cans, into her genital area.’”
And here is the Finklestein response:
"Alas, he didn’t specify how many cans, or whether or not they were Campbell’s Soup."
In response to a witness testifying that he observed the body of a man with severed male genitlia in his mouth, Finklestein adds in parenthesis, " (With or without condiments?) ".
In response to dead women being found without underwear, Finklestein concludes that dead women and girls found murdered, naked or half naked, cannot possibly have anything to do with men that gleefully murdered young girls and women but somehow had the moral restraint to not also rape and sexually abuse. Finkelstein writes:
"It seems not to have occurred to our amateur Sherlocks that perhaps the victims weren’t wearing underwear. Be that as it may, it is credible that bodies were found partially or fully naked: the attack began in the “predawn and dawn hours”; the largest massacre unfolded at the Supernova festival that was celebrating “free love."
Here is a Finklestein response to a summary of a civil commission-
First the summary:
"The Civil Commission likewise documented cases in which bodies were found with various objects, including nails, aluminum cans and other items, inserted into their genitals.”
And now the Finklestein response.
"It appears that the witnesses tastefully omitted the kitchen sink, toilet bowl, and corner gas station."
People that do not hesitate to murder babies, children, defenseless people of all ages, which even Finkelstein acknowledges Hamas committed on October 7, 2023, and that he defends, are not above raping and sexually abusing. A man capable of murdering babies, children, women, girls, the very old and other defenseless people in cold blood does not live by a moral code that would preclude that person from raping and sexually abusing. The willingness of Hamas to take videos of the slaughter and other atrocities but not expose themselves in pornographic images does not, despite the Finklestein assertions, mean the crimes did not occur.