Do Animal Organizations Want To End Dog Fighting and Animal Cruelty, Or Just Exploit It?

I know that there is very little, if anything, that I can truly impact in this world in a major way. In a small scale way, I still hope that there can be change. Like acknowledging that animal cruelty and dog fighting are crimes, and that as such, only broad based public law enforcement should respond(not token forces that are ineffective and only there for show).Most importantly, no animal organization should respond to or investigate animal cruelty. I believe they are ineffective, useless, often harmful, self serving entities. But because so much money is being made by a variety of animal organizations that are perfectly content with the status qua,(because it is so lucrative for them) no matter how harmful it has been, and will continue to be, nothing will change for the better. They will pay lip service to the idea that animal cruelty and dog fighting are crimes, but beyond their empty words, do nothing to jeopardize their careers and that which butters their bread. Animal cruelty and dog fighting, if truly treated as violent crime, would move fully and completely into the hands of public, broad based law enforcement. And if fully enforced, I believe there would be a reduction in violent crime. When people commit violent, brutal criminal acts on one level, their criminal actions and criminal violence easily escalates to another. Why are a variety of animal organizations so eager to keep the illusion going that they are actually doing something of substance about animal cruelty? Because the illusion brings in money, donors and support. If someone really cares about reducing a violent crime, if someone really cares about reducing the violent rimes of animal cruelty and dog fighting, why would they not want there to be a broad based public law enforcement response? After all, the police are present 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, all over the place, and so are the animal abusers.