Animal Cruelty Golddiggers

     Over two decades ago, a police officer working one of the highest crime areas in the United States, tried to bring attention to the fact that dog fighting and animal cruelty related crimes were massively ignored. These crimes were ignored by law enforcement, which allowed them to flourish.

      At the start of that cops career in the early 1980's, domestic violence crimes and drunk driving were also minimally responded to by law enforcement. Rather than accept this, anti domestic violence groups and anti drunk driving organizations aggressively campaigned for law enforcement to respond appropriately to those crimes. The law enforcement response today to domestic violence and driving under the influence (drunk driving, etc.), while not perfect, is far better then it was decades ago. 

       Animal organizations and police departments will not hesitate to say that dogfighting and animal cruelty are bad, even as they either ignore or exploit these crimes. Because police continue to minimally respond to animal cruelty related crimes, including dog fighting, with very few exceptions (exceptions include token, ineffective teams that are nothing more than excuses for greater law enforcement to continue to do nothing), the enforcement of animal cruelty laws are but a tiny fraction of what they should be. 

       Anti drunk driving and anti domestic violence organizations never said - "Because the police do not do their jobs in regards to these crimes, we will take over". For that reason, there are not mothers running around chasing down drunk drivers. There are not anti domestic violence organizations and anti drink driving organizations running around chasing after domestic violence offenders and drunk drivers. Bike shops do not have bike shop employees chasing down bicycle thieves. Car dealerships do not have employees responding to vehicle theft.

        Why do animal organizations like to continue the charade that they are the answer to animal cruelty? Because whoever wears the cloak that has the public convinced that they are the answer to animal cruelty gets all the riches. The gains are enormous. Huge sums of money flows to the organizations claiming to address animal cruelty and dog fighting.

          No matter how ineffective they are, no matter how harmful they are (many animals have been hurt and killed by ineffective, often harmful investigations by animal organizations), they will not stop what they are doing. Because animals cannot communicate in the way humans can, these organizations can continue their destructive behavior.

          Animals left dying out in the cold, like other forms of animal cruelty, requires a simple police response. It is not brain surgery. But the animal organizations want the public to believe that they, not the police, are the main answer to  animal cruelty.

           Big money is involved when it comes to animal cruelty and dog fighting. The cop learned the hard way how whorish people can be, including when photographs that he took to expose dog fighting and animal cruelty were plagiarized. He observed how greedy people exploited dogfighting and animal cruelty in order to make money through self serving documentaries and other media events. He observed how dogfighting and animal cruelty became huge money makers for a variety of animal organizations and individuals. When Michael Vick was arrested for dogfighting, an incredibly rare event due to the lack of proper law enforcement, it was free publicity and a money maker for a number of ineffective animal organizations.
            Crime belongs in the hands of police. Animal cruelty golddiggers have made sure this will never happen except in the most minimal way when it comes to animal related crimes.