Smollett And Farrakhan; One Victimized By Victimhood, The Other Shielded By It

          Smollett is a victim of victimhood. He was raised in a culture that values victimhood and that panders to it. A culture that makes a simplistic dichotomy between who is privileged and who is not, often based on skin pigmentation alone. A culture that holds one standard of conduct for some, and a much lower one for those considered victims. A culture with different expectations and standards for different groups.
           Smollett probably knew that if he pulled off what he schemed- victimized because of race and sexual preference- doors would open that never would have opened otherwise.
           Everytime a Farrakhan steps on stage, manipulating and exploiting racism to spin false narratives with the Jew as the most frequent target, he is applauded. Was Farrakhan ever a victim of race, having lived a pampered life that only victimhood, which includes freedom from responsibility, and Jew hate could afford? A hate that freed him from ever having to work a real job, and that brought fame and fortune. Farrakhan gets to lie and promote hate, shielded by victimhood. He gets to travel freely to Iran and discuss openly the evil Jew by himself and his Iranian counterparts, and the terrible United States, on tax deductible trips made possible by the generosity of the United States.
           Smollett manipulated race and hate the wrong way, so he gets to go to jail, if found guilty, and loses more than likely the lucrative career that he had.
           Farrakhan manipulates victimhood the right way, even though he has never been the victim of anything (other than the fact that his skin color places him automatically in the victimhood category, and even though few have lived lives as easy and pampered as his), and thus he gets riches and mingles with presidents.